Violence in Community Where Rayshard Brooks Was Killed: Citizens Shot At, Attacked and Intimidated While Driving Home

Mining Awareness +

Both black and white citizens are being shot at, attacked and intimidated on their way home, in the area where Rayshard Brooks was shot in Atlanta. Police say they are attacked, as well.

Even if Atlanta PD decide to go back to work, it doesn’t mean that they will work. They can report to duty but fail to show up, when you need them. They can do slow-downs. They can sit and watch ball-games and tell people to call them back if everything’s still not ok. If it’s still not ok, it’s too late. Everyone wants to talk about over-policing, but no one talks about the dangers of under-policing. These are two extremes – over-policing looks like a dictatorship and under-policing the wild, wild west.

Violence in community where Rayshard Brooks was killed


People take over property where Rayshard Brooks was killed, set up roadblock

View original post 35 more words

Now what moron will be brave enough to go to jail for 10 years

FDA warning: These 9 hand sanitizer brands could be toxic nation-world

The FDA is warning that the public should stop using 9 brands of hand sanitizer because the products may contain methanol, or wood alcohol. Author: TEGNA Published: 6:56 AM EDT June 23, 2020

WASHINGTON — The coronavirus pandemic has led to a surge in hand sanitizer purchases, but now the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that nine brands may be potentially toxic. 

The FDA said Friday that consumers should stop using any hand sanitizer from Mexico-based manufacturer Eskbiochem SA de CV, due to the potential presence of methanol, or wood alcohol, in its products. The FDA warned that methanol can be toxic when ingested or absorbed through the skin.  null

The agency said that it contacted Eskbiochem last week to recommend the company remove its hand sanitizer from the U.S. market, but it has yet to do so. 

“Therefore, FDA recommends consumers stop using these hand sanitizers and dispose of them immediately in appropriate hazardous waste containers. Do not flush or pour these products down the drain,” the agency warned

The FDA warned that young children who accidentally ingest these potentially toxic hand sanitizers and those who may drink it as an alcohol substitute are most at risk of suffering methanol poisoning. The symptoms of substantial methanol exposure includes nausea, vomiting, headache, blurred vision, permanent blindness, seizures, coma, permanent damage to the nervous system or death. 

RELATED: Safety tips to consider when returning to restaurants

RELATED: FDA asks hand sanitizer producers to make them taste worse

“Methanol is not an acceptable ingredient for hand sanitizers and should not be used due to its toxic effects,” the agency warned. “Consumers who have been exposed to hand sanitizer containing methanol should seek immediate treatment, which is critical for potential reversal of toxic effects of methanol poisoning.”

The FDA listed the following products in its warning: 

– All-Clean Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-002-01)

– Esk Biochem Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-007-01)

– CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-008-04)

– Lavar 70 Gel Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-006-01)

– The Good Gel Antibacterial Gel Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-010-10) null

– CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-005-03)

– CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 75% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-009-01)

– CleanCare NoGerm Advanced Hand Sanitizer 80% Alcohol (NDC: 74589-003-01)

– Saniderm Advanced Hand Sanitizer (NDC: 74589-001-01)

According to the FDA, it tested product samples and found Lavar Gel contained 81% methanol and CleanCare No Germ had 28% methanol. 

The agency said Friday it’s not aware of any reports of illnesses related to these potentially toxic hand sanitizers. 

The FDA stressed that washing your hands with soap and water is one of the best defenses against coronavirus. But if soap and water isn’t available, the CDC recommends using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60% ethanol.



Author (s): LKM Recipient (s): FRANCE-EUROPE FACEBOOK headquarters The petition

I knew that Facebook had a dark side, following the scandal of “Cambridge Analytica”. For those who were not aware of this case, in 2018, a computer genius discovered that more than 87 million personal data were recovered without the knowledge of users.

On Facebook, the little innocuous tests that we regularly fill in the form of games, and others are far from being as commonplace as they seem, they allow them to collect a large amount of information on the personality and habits of users, in a roundabout way, subliminal.
These are then sold to various well-known advertisers in the consumer markets.

Following this scandal which made the headlines of the media, millions of subscribers had definitively closed their accounts.

In short, this was just a reminder of Facebook’s unscrupulous actions.

In my case, I registered on this site for one and only reason: The defense of animals.

But it turns out that, again, I have serious questions about Facebook’s biases. Indeed, I have just been blocked for a month following the publication of an animated image of their own list, I give you the reason for this blocking: ”  Does not respect the standards of the community concerning nudity or acts sexual ”!

While hundreds of erotic images of women leaving no doubt about their intentions are circulating without any censorship, I find myself blocked by the animated image of a little cat rummaging in a drawer!

I know that we, animal friends, vegan, vegetarians in addition, more and more numerous every day, have a considerable list of informers. Our fight in animal protection disturbs, and as a result, we regularly receive violent verbal attacks from hunters, breeders and all those for whom the death of an animal is exploitable and lucrative.

However, and by the greatest chance, when we have altercations with them, a few days later, we find ourselves blocked, the denunciation on the part of this type of individuals is not a surprise for anyone, but what What is much more surprising is that these people are never reprimanded, nor even blocked by Facebook!

When I say Facebook, we don’t know who is doing what, since according to my information, algorithms manage blockages.

What is very amusing on this site, it is their manner of infantilising the users: a stupidity equals a punishment, you do not go around the corner, but one blocks you for fixed durations, more or less long! Very childish as a process.

Me, I want to play in your sandbox, but I would not be dizzy on the turnstile of your unjustified punishments!